Unemployment: When Good News is Bad, and Bad News is Good
Posted by Jim Heitman on July 5th, 2010The May job numbers seemed good, but were really bad news. The recovery had been producing steady real job growth, and on the surface the May numbers looked great with total non-farm employment up 430,000. The unfortunate truth was that the vast majority of those new jobs were census workers whose jobs are to last only a short time. Hiring by private employers was quite small (+41,000) and few real jobs were created. Unemployment dropped to 9.7%, but most of that improvement was due to census hiring. The market responded to the ugly truth behind the happy numbers negatively, as was expected.
Last week June’s numbers were released. It was an unpleasant decline of 125,000 non-farm payrolls reported. However, this includes the layoff of 225,000 census workers. Private sector payrolls increased to 83,000, more than double last month. This is really good news, though the private sector needs to add more than 100,000 jobs a month just to keep up with population growth. Also, the unemployment rate dropped to 9.5%, though this is not particularly good news as the drop is mostly a result of workers becoming discouraged and giving up. The market responded negatively to the good news.
The market is not a great indicator in the short term. Sometimes the market treats bad news as neutral and good news as good news. Not right now though. Right now the market treats good news as neutral and bad news as bad. Don’t expect a nice uptick in stocks until the market shakes the blues.
Let’s get back to the unemployment rate. This number is an important indicator of mood and economic activity, but it is a bit deceptive. The rate is a measure of the percentage of people who have or want a job and don’t have a one. A person is said to want a job if they have actively looked for work in the prior four weeks. This is supposed to weed out those people who do not want to return to the workforce. In an extended downturn (or slow recovery) a number of workers become discouraged and quite looking. The drop in the unemployment rate is more a result of a reduction in those who are actively seeking work rather than a real increase in total employment.
The headlines will cover these signs of weakness, trumpeting the poor showing as compared to the average post-war recovery. However, this slow recovery, particularly in employment, was what we saw for the last two recoveries (1991 and 2002). We may need to adjust our expectations; the jobless recovery may be the new normal in the information age. It is neither good nor bad, it is just the way it is. Unless you need a job, then it is just bad.
![]() |
Jim Heitman, CFP®, is a writer, speaker, Certified Financial Planning practitioner in Southern California, and the founder of Compass Financial Planning – a fee-only planning and money management firm. |




Recent Comments